The Climate-Driven Diaspora Is Here


Many places are becoming increasingly unlivable. And around one-quarter of humanity is already dealing with drought and associated food insecurity. By 2070, one-fifth of the planet could become too hot for normal human life, causing up to 3.5 billion people to move. Sea level rise alone could displace 410 million people globally by 2100.

We are poised to see the largest and fastest movement of people in human history. New policy frameworks will be needed. In 2025, we will begin to shift from reactive to proactive, and start to embrace the imperative of climate-driven relocation.

Unsurprisingly, climate-driven relocation will hit poor communities and communities of color hardest. Those with the fewest resources to adapt, who did the least to cause the climate crisis, will bear the brunt. Think of the 33 million displaced by the floods in Pakistan in 2022, with 9.4 million acres of farmland damaged or destroyed. Think of how the history of racism in America increases climate risks—formerly redlined neighborhoods have 25 percent more homes facing high flood risk. But no person, no place is immune—think of the heat waves in Europe in 2022 that killed more than 61,000, where few people have air conditioning because it was never needed. At the rate humanity continues to spew greenhouse gases, all that could be just a dress rehearsal.

To date, most climate migration has occurred within nations, but as the regions affected by extreme weather expand, that will need to change. We will have to be vigilant about keeping xenophobia at bay, acknowledging the cruel injustice at play as the lowest greenhouse gas emitting nations, like the Pacific islands, are the first to be inundated.

Where will people go? How will this be managed? One thing is certain: Ignoring the problem will not make it go away; to the contrary, it will result in chaos. At the international, national, and local levels, we will begin to develop policies to fill the current legislative and regulatory void, like restricting construction of housing in high-risk areas. One example is the State of New Jersey buying out around 200 property owners in Woodbridge Township—one of the areas most affected by flooding from Hurricane Irene in 2011 and Hurricane Sandy in 2012—to ban new construction developments and return the land to nature.

Other initiatives and policies will involve preparing lower-risk areas to become receiving communities for those who must relocate. In the Pacific, one of the world’s lowest greenhouse emitting regions, whole nations are in danger of being inundated. The nation of Kiribati has already bought land in Fiji as part of their plan to ultimately relocate people as needed due to sea level rise. In 2023, 18 Pacific Island nations endorsed the Pacific Regional Framework on Climate Mobility, which outlines several priorities such as regional collaboration on cross-border relocation to ensure that human rights are being respected, developing guidelines in consultation with relocating communities and coordinating support between countries for cross-border migrants.

In 2025, at the level of individuals and families, we will see those with means start to relocate proactively. Already, 11 percent of Americans have considered moving to avoid the impacts of global warming, and roughly 75 percent are hesitant to buy homes in areas with high climate risks like wildfires (more than 30 million homes in the lower 48 US states are at risk of being hit with wildfires).

We will also continue to see the insurance market play a significant role in these shifts, as more and more high-risk places become uninsurable. For instance, in 2023, the National Flood Insurance Program changed its pricing structure for the first time since it was established in 1968. As a result, the average cost of flood insurance has risen in many places—in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, it soared by more than 1,000 percent.

In 2025, continually rebuilding in the same places after extreme weather events, standard practice to date, will become widely understood as absurd. It’s not that people want to move, to leave the communities and ecosystems they love and call home; it’s that they must. Cultures and diasporas will start shifting to embrace this new reality. Many of them will face a stark question: What does home actually mean in the age of climate breakdown?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *